<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <channel>
  <atom:link href="http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/rss/thread/33436.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <title>COMSOL Forums: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
  <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/</link>
  <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
  
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p95083</link>
   <description>Hi&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
the phasor approach (complex amplitudes), should work check the the doc&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
--&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Good luck&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Ivar</description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 05:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1359954862.95083</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p95055</link>
   <description>&lt;div class=&quot;quote&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Hi&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
have you got your model running ?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
At least you could reduce the overall air size to some diam 0.4 ad somewhat longer than you imported model, then add some 4 cm of infinite elements and set them up for cylindrical coordinates. But I'm not sure what you expect to see ?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
then you define the ima,b,c over all the domains, but they have some sense only locally, I would rather use the formula directly in the multi-Turn Coil BCs&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Anyhow for continuous AC you should use the frequency sweep mode at a fixed frequency of 60 Hz and then give the amplitudes as complex values (physors) for the phase instead of the wv1,2,3(t) approach. The time domain is only useful for a transient turn on, and in MF you do not get any ringing as the 2nd time derivative physics is ignored&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
--&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Good luck&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Ivar&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
thanks. I think I have to give up using time dependent analysis with this model. But the problem is phase shift. How can I consider Ib=120&amp;lt;-240deg (i.e. 120 amplitude and -240degree of phase angle). I can define this in time dependent but I don't know how to define it in frequency sweep. please help&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Regards,</description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1359927993.95055</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p94719</link>
   <description>Hi&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
have you got your model running ?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
At least you could reduce the overall air size to some diam 0.4 ad somewhat longer than you imported model, then add some 4 cm of infinite elements and set them up for cylindrical coordinates. But I'm not sure what you expect to see ?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
then you define the ima,b,c over all the domains, but they have some sense only locally, I would rather use the formula directly in the multi-Turn Coil BCs&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Anyhow for continuous AC you should use the frequency sweep mode at a fixed frequency of 60 Hz and then give the amplitudes as complex values (physors) for the phase instead of the wv1,2,3(t) approach. The time domain is only useful for a transient turn on, and in MF you do not get any ringing as the 2nd time derivative physics is ignored&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
--&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Good luck&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Ivar</description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1359402143.94719</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p92856</link>
   <description>Hi fellas&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I finally could have time-dependent analysis with magnetic field solution. however it has a serious problem. I used MF solver with multi turn coil for each phase of my machine. the problem is working for just a single phase and when I enable the boundary for the second and/or third phase, the solver doesn't work. I tried many modification but no progress. I would appreciate if you would help me. the file is attached (the solution is removed because of the large size: 800MB)&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Regards, &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1356304142.92856</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p91917</link>
   <description>Hi&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
if you are studying a steady state sinus, it often far easier and quicker to use the frequency domain solver than a true transient, transient behaviour and sustained sinus excitation is not fully the same, because you have all the transient effects from your inperfect BC's in the time solver&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
--&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Good luck&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Ivar</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 15:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1354895711.91917</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p91914</link>
   <description>what a comprehensive answer. thanks.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
you mentioned &amp;quot; you run time solving in EC and a parametric sweep in MF based on the current domain mapping&amp;quot; . would you mention the details or refer to a document about this coupling?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Regards,</description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1354892148.91914</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p91819</link>
   <description>Hi&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
check &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comsol.eu/community/forums/general/thread/33429/#p91817&quot; title=&quot;www.comsol.eu/community/forums/general/thread/33429/#p91817&quot;&gt;www.comsol.eu/community/forums/general/thread/33429/#p91817&lt;/a&gt; and see if that can inspire you ;)&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
--&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Good luck&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Ivar</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1354822835.91819</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p91811</link>
   <description>thanks for the answer. the final question from is this: is there anyway to apply voltage and see magnetic field while using time dependent solver?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thanks for support&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1354819315.91811</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p91803</link>
   <description>Hi&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
there is  in the doc if you get to the right page ;), but you should also check the solver proposed when you enter the physics, there you see which are &amp;quot;set-up&amp;quot; by default, and also by looking to the equations , if you have d/dt 's your time response will work  if you have w omega's, the frequency response too, but if none appear, when you switch your selected solvers then no luck.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Also ACDC is assuming instantaneous time response on the magnet fields, else you are in wave propagation mode = RF&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
--&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Good luck&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Ivar</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1354807837.91803</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p91800</link>
   <description>great answer. thank you very much. I don't know why there is no note about incompatibility of MEF with time dependent solver in manuals. Also thanks for your note. but one question rises now&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
if magnetic and electric interface doesn't work for this, how can we see magnetic field while we apply voltage to the model. another question is &amp;quot; Is it OK to use parametric solver with the time as variable instead of time dependent one with magnetic and electric solver?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Regards,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1354804986.91800</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p91789</link>
   <description>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
The Magnetic and Electric fields physics does not support Time-dependent studies, only Stationary and Frequency. You can see it in the Time Dependent step (the yellow sign near the physics's name in the table).&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Depending on what you want to do, you need to use another physics, for example Electric Currents.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Note that your model as it is now cannot be solved with a Magnetic interface since it does not respect current conservation (current is &amp;quot;created&amp;quot; on one boundary and &amp;quot;destroyed&amp;quot; on another).&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
--&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Andrea Ferrario&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Electromagnetics Group&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
COMSOL AB</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1354785441.91789</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>sinusoidal voltage to time dependent solver</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/33436/#p91738</link>
   <description>I am trying to apply sinusoidal voltage to a model with time dependent solver. I apply the voltage based on a function but it doesn't show anything. the model is attached. &lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
thanks</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">33436.1354740013.91738</guid>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
