<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 <channel>
  <atom:link href="http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/rss/thread/34014.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <title>COMSOL Forums: Reflectance / Transmittance calculation using PORT</title>
  <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/34014/</link>
  <description>Most recent forum messages</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
  
  <item>
   <title>Re: Reflectance / Transmittance calculation using PORT</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/34014/#p93509</link>
   <description>Thanks a lot!&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
This is a big helpful to me.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">34014.1357861554.93509</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: Reflectance / Transmittance calculation using PORT</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/34014/#p93497</link>
   <description>1. Electric field BC - you simply specify total electric field at the boundary. Since you generally don't know the reflected field, you can't use it&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Scattering BC - to launch plane waves&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Port BC - to launch plane waves as well as any other. As a benefit, reflection coefficients are calculated for you.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
2. Floquet BC is more general since it takes care of phase shift at the boundary. Continuity BC doesn't.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
3. No. You should use Floquet. I'd suggest using it always, even when PEC/PMC would work.</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">34014.1357840270.93497</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: Reflectance / Transmittance calculation using PORT</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/34014/#p93428</link>
   <description>Thanks sir.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I wanna ask you 3 more things.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
1. As far as I know, there are 3 ways to generate electric field.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
  - Scattering boundary condition&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
  - Electric field&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
  - Port&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Could you explain the differences between them?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
2. Many libraries are using Floquet periodicity for imposing periodic boundary condition.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
In my humble opinion, effect of &amp;quot;Floquet periodicity option&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Continuity option&amp;quot; might be same.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Is it right?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
3. For periodicity, PEC(PMC) condition can be used when electric(magnetic) field is normal to surface.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
So.. if field is not perpendicular to a certain surface, I should use a periodic condition instead of PEC/PMC.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Is it also right?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I have had difficulty choosinig boundary conditions. :(&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
</description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">34014.1357776005.93428</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Re: Reflectance / Transmittance calculation using PORT</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/34014/#p93400</link>
   <description>1. Yes, generally&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
2. Electric field BC won't give you the correct solution. Only scattering BC will work.</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">34014.1357749454.93400</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
   <title>Reflectance / Transmittance calculation using PORT</title>
   <link>http://www.comsol.com/community/forums/general/thread/34014/#p93368</link>
   <description>Hello all&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
I want to calculate effect of nanostructure on reflectance and transmittance.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
As a starting point, I have refered &amp;quot;Fresnel equation&amp;quot; library.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Without any nanostructure, the calculated reflectance is well matched with theorectical value!&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
So.. one thing I want to know is that the same port boundary condition can be applied to a model system with 3D nano structure? (Simply, air/Nanostructures on substrate/substrate)&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Also, I want to calculate the reflectance using input and output power.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Output power can be calculated using integration of time-averaged power outflow (nPoav).&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
However, I don't know how to know incident power when I use scattering boundary condition, or electric field condition.&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Would you comment on this?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&amp;lt;Summary&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
1. Using same model of &amp;quot;Fresnel equation&amp;quot; library, can reflectance of a system with 3D nano structure be calculate?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
2. How can I calculate incident power of light, when I use electric field boudnary condition?&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
&lt;br /&gt;&#13;
Dong-yeong Kim</description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 05:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">34014.1357710794.93368</guid>
  </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
