-
Filter by Topic
Release
Popular Topics
- List all discussions
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Delicious
Digg
Stumbleupon
More services...wrong number of function arguments
|
Thread index | Previous thread | Next thread | Start a new discussion |
RSS feed |
Turn on email notifications |
3 Replies
Last post: October 12, 2012 5:32pm UTC
October 10, 2012 6:57pm UTC
wrong number of function arguments
Hello,
I keep getting the same error for my analytical function
"Wrong number of function arguments
Number of arguments expected: 3"
But as far as I can tell, I have defined 3 arguments in my function.. so I don't understand the error!
expression: a_c*pore_V(x,y,z)
Arguments: x, y, z
(a_c = a variable and pore_V(x,y,z) = random fxn)
Does anyone know whats happening?
Thank you!
Kelley
Reply | Reply with Quote | Send private message | Report Abuse
October 11, 2012 5:30am UTC in response to Kelley Rabjohns
Re: wrong number of function arguments
Hi
no, not like that, probably you must make a simple model example and post that too (you do not need to give the full model, "just" reproduce the error in a simple new model
--
Good luck
Ivar
Reply | Reply with Quote | Send private message | Report Abuse
October 12, 2012 5:07pm UTC in response to Ivar Kjelberg
Re: wrong number of function arguments
Here is a simplified (but very similar) model with the same error. Maybe I am misunderstanding how to define the arguments?
Reply | Reply with Quote | Send private message | Report Abuse
October 12, 2012 5:32pm UTC in response to Kelley Rabjohns
Re: wrong number of function arguments
I think I figured out the error... I was trying to use the analytic function in the model in an anisotropic flow field. I was defining the flow field like
f(x) f(y) f(z)
but I think I needed to do
f(x,x,x) f(y,y,y) f(z,z,z)
for there to be 3 arguments in the model. Does that sound correct?
or should it be defined
f(x,y,z) for each flow direction (xx, yy, zz)?
Reply | Reply with Quote | Send private message | Report Abuse
Rules and guidelines
