-
Filter by Topic
Most Popular
All Topics
- List all discussions
boundary integration in podtprocessing
|
Thread index | Previous thread | Next thread | Start a new discussion |
March 10, 2010 4:14pm UTC
boundary integration in podtprocessing
Dear all,
I have a simple question about comression simulation.
I have a cube in mechanical module.
I applied a prescribed displacement(in -y direction)as a boundary settings for upper boundary.
bottom boundary is fixed.
In Postprocessing/boundary integration I clicked on upper boundary and chose reaction force in y direction.
This reaction force has negative value!!!!!!!
How it can be that I press on cube and cube's reaction force is negative?
Thanks in advance,
Alex
Reply | Reply with Quote | Send private message | Report Abuse
March 14, 2010 5:24pm UTC in response to Alex Zinchenko
Re: boundary integration in podtprocessing
Hi
I would expect that the reaction force sign is defined with respect to the surface normal = direction pointing "outwards" of the volume.
Therefore I find the signs rather coherent that way, but I agree it's a convention issue
Do you agree ?
Good luck
Ivar
Reply | Reply with Quote | Send private message | Report Abuse
March 15, 2010 10:18am UTC in response to Ivar Kjelberg
Re: boundary integration in podtprocessing
Hi Ivar,
of course it is but the problem is that in my case it works only in x and z directions.
It should be that reaction force directed according axes but this rule works only in x and z directions...
in y direction(where my prescribed displacement applied) it works in opposite way...
Thank you in advance,
Alex
Reply | Reply with Quote | Send private message | Report Abuse
August 10, 2010 9:14pm UTC in response to Alex Zinchenko
Re: boundary integration in podtprocessing
Hi Alex:
I am having a similar issue, I was wondering if you can help me. I am modeling the insertion of a probe into the a cube. The probe I am having in post processing is that using point evaluation on vertices or boundary integration on the probe boundaries, the reaction force is always zero (in the z-direction of insertion).
I am looking for the resistance force that the probe is experiencing during the insertion - this is the reaction force right?
Also, for those points on the surface of the cube that are not part of the geometry, I cannot do point evaluation of any parameters on those points, any idea why?
I am attaching a simple version of this simulation.
Thank you,
Joe
Reply | Reply with Quote | Send private message | Report Abuse
August 11, 2010 6:26am UTC in response to Ivar Kjelberg
Re: boundary integration in podtprocessing
Hi Ivar:
I am having a similar issue, I was wondering if you can help me. I am modeling the insertion of a probe into the a cube. The probe I am having in post processing is that using point evaluation on vertices or boundary integration on the probe boundaries, the reaction force is always zero (in the z-direction of insertion).
I am looking for the resistance force that the probe is experiencing during the insertion - this is the reaction force right?
Also, for those points on the surface of the cube that are not part of the geometry, I cannot do point evaluation of any parameters on those points, any idea why?
I am attaching a simple version of this simulation.
Thank you,
Joe
Reply | Reply with Quote | Send private message | Report Abuse
Rules and guidelines

