Ruud Borger
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 2, 2011, 7:25 a.m. EDT
Dear Osameh,
The way to do this is to solve your initial model, then go back to Study 1. Open it, right-click "Solver 1" and press "Disable". This means that the solver sequence, and the solution attached to it, will not be changed. If you now right-click Study 1, and press "Show default solver", then a new solver sequence is built (Solver 2). Open this one, and in "Dependent variables", choose the solution from Solver 1 as initial values.
Tip #1: To keep an overview, it helps to rename "Solver 1" to "Solver V=3" or something related to your boundary condition, so that you can keep track of which solver contains what. The same goes for the solution.
Tip #2: You can automatize this process by using a parametric sweep.
Hope that helps,
Ruud Borger
COMSOLBV
Dear Osameh,
The way to do this is to solve your initial model, then go back to Study 1. Open it, right-click "Solver 1" and press "Disable". This means that the solver sequence, and the solution attached to it, will not be changed. If you now right-click Study 1, and press "Show default solver", then a new solver sequence is built (Solver 2). Open this one, and in "Dependent variables", choose the solution from Solver 1 as initial values.
Tip #1: To keep an overview, it helps to rename "Solver 1" to "Solver V=3" or something related to your boundary condition, so that you can keep track of which solver contains what. The same goes for the solution.
Tip #2: You can automatize this process by using a parametric sweep.
Hope that helps,
Ruud Borger
COMSOLBV
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 2, 2011, 9:15 a.m. EDT
Thank you so much
I have two sections named Dependent Variables in Solver 1 node, one of them is "Dependent variable 1" for transient initialization and the other one is 'Dependent variable 2" for time dependent.
1) In my new solver (Solver 2) I have to change the initial values of the both dependent variables sections ??
2) what is the "values not solved for" section ?
Best regards,
Thank you so much
I have two sections named Dependent Variables in Solver 1 node, one of them is "Dependent variable 1" for transient initialization and the other one is 'Dependent variable 2" for time dependent.
1) In my new solver (Solver 2) I have to change the initial values of the both dependent variables sections ??
2) what is the "values not solved for" section ?
Best regards,
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 2, 2011, 10:37 a.m. EDT
Hi
when you have several physics you might select which ones are actives for each solver, hence you might want to add two solvers, sequently, and only solve one physics per soler node, then you need to decide what to do with the dependnet variables "not solved for"
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
when you have several physics you might select which ones are actives for each solver, hence you might want to add two solvers, sequently, and only solve one physics per soler node, then you need to decide what to do with the dependnet variables "not solved for"
--
Good luck
Ivar
Ruud Borger
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 2, 2011, 12:55 p.m. EDT
Thank you so much
I have two sections named Dependent Variables in Solver 1 node, one of them is "Dependent variable 1" for transient initialization and the other one is 'Dependent variable 2" for time dependent.
1) In my new solver (Solver 2) I have to change the initial values of the both dependent variables sections ??
2) what is the "values not solved for" section ?
Best regards,
1) The transient initialization and time dependent studies are separate. The initialization probably does not need initial values (depends a bit on the physics interface(s) you are using). The time dependent part does benefit from them, use "Variables solved for" in this case.
2) "Variables not solved for" means exactly what it says. For instance, a fluid flow calculation may use the temperature from a different physics interface (Heat Transfer). In this case, the temperature T is a variable not solved for. So, if you first do a Heat Transfer calculation and then want to use these results in the fluid flow calculation, then you use the initial value under "Variables not solved for". If you want to use the results from a previous fluid flow calculation for a new flow calculation, then you use "Variables solved for".
Best regards,
Ruud Borger,
COMSOL
[QUOTE]
Thank you so much
I have two sections named Dependent Variables in Solver 1 node, one of them is "Dependent variable 1" for transient initialization and the other one is 'Dependent variable 2" for time dependent.
1) In my new solver (Solver 2) I have to change the initial values of the both dependent variables sections ??
2) what is the "values not solved for" section ?
Best regards,
[/QUOTE]
1) The transient initialization and time dependent studies are separate. The initialization probably does not need initial values (depends a bit on the physics interface(s) you are using). The time dependent part does benefit from them, use "Variables solved for" in this case.
2) "Variables not solved for" means exactly what it says. For instance, a fluid flow calculation may use the temperature from a different physics interface (Heat Transfer). In this case, the temperature T is a variable not solved for. So, if you first do a Heat Transfer calculation and then want to use these results in the fluid flow calculation, then you use the initial value under "Variables not solved for". If you want to use the results from a previous fluid flow calculation for a new flow calculation, then you use "Variables solved for".
Best regards,
Ruud Borger,
COMSOL
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jun 3, 2011, 10:19 a.m. EDT
Would someone guide me about how to use parametric sweep to automate the changing boundary conditions case? if it is written some where in the documentations that accompanied COMSOL that will be great.
Thanks
Sherif
Would someone guide me about how to use parametric sweep to automate the changing boundary conditions case? if it is written some where in the documentations that accompanied COMSOL that will be great.
Thanks
Sherif
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Aug 3, 2011, 6:07 a.m. EDT
Hi,
I have a problem to use a saved solution.
The model has two physics : Heat Transer and Solid Mechanics.
I disable the solver 1 and create an other solver. I select the solution of solver 1 as initial values for solver 2 by the dependent variables node : Method = solution
Solution = Solver 1
Time = automatic
It is working well for the temperature. But the stresses of Solver 2 at t=0 are 0!
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Alexis
Hi,
I have a problem to use a saved solution.
The model has two physics : Heat Transer and Solid Mechanics.
I disable the solver 1 and create an other solver. I select the solution of solver 1 as initial values for solver 2 by the dependent variables node : Method = solution
Solution = Solver 1
Time = automatic
It is working well for the temperature. But the stresses of Solver 2 at t=0 are 0!
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Alexis
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jan 29, 2013, 2:57 a.m. EST
Would someone guide me about how to use parametric sweep to automate the changing boundary conditions case? if it is written some where in the documentations that accompanied COMSOL that will be great.
Thanks
Sherif
you can define a parameter under 'global definitions' and name it, for instant, 'para' with the value 0;
use the parameter in your changing boundary condition;
right click the study and add the 'parametric sweep', choose ' para' from the list, then you can define the range of the value to sweep.
[QUOTE]
Would someone guide me about how to use parametric sweep to automate the changing boundary conditions case? if it is written some where in the documentations that accompanied COMSOL that will be great.
Thanks
Sherif
[/QUOTE]
you can define a parameter under 'global definitions' and name it, for instant, 'para' with the value 0;
use the parameter in your changing boundary condition;
right click the study and add the 'parametric sweep', choose ' para' from the list, then you can define the range of the value to sweep.
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Jan 29, 2013, 1:56 p.m. EST
Hi
I have also issues to really understand when I get the initial conditions truely transferred, and when not,
I'm missing something like a line in the log file stating reading T from study 1 or something like that, and for each variable. I was woundering, if for the stress, if one shold add an initial stress sub node or not, I cannot find anything in the doc, which (sub)node is really populated: just the initial values, other subnodes ... ?
Here I find that a verbose log file really could help !
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
I have also issues to really understand when I get the initial conditions truely transferred, and when not,
I'm missing something like a line in the log file stating reading T from study 1 or something like that, and for each variable. I was woundering, if for the stress, if one shold add an initial stress sub node or not, I cannot find anything in the doc, which (sub)node is really populated: just the initial values, other subnodes ... ?
Here I find that a verbose log file really could help !
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Dec 16, 2013, 6:19 a.m. EST
Hi,
i have a problem in transferring load from one physics to other i want to transfer load from Piezoelectric structure to FSI can you tell me which option i have to select for this purpose?
Best Regards
Hi
I have also issues to really understand when I get the initial conditions truely transferred, and when not,
I'm missing something like a line in the log file stating reading T from study 1 or something like that, and for each variable. I was woundering, if for the stress, if one shold add an initial stress sub node or not, I cannot find anything in the doc, which (sub)node is really populated: just the initial values, other subnodes ... ?
Here I find that a verbose log file really could help !
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi,
i have a problem in transferring load from one physics to other i want to transfer load from Piezoelectric structure to FSI can you tell me which option i have to select for this purpose?
Best Regards
[QUOTE]
Hi
I have also issues to really understand when I get the initial conditions truely transferred, and when not,
I'm missing something like a line in the log file stating reading T from study 1 or something like that, and for each variable. I was woundering, if for the stress, if one shold add an initial stress sub node or not, I cannot find anything in the doc, which (sub)node is really populated: just the initial values, other subnodes ... ?
Here I find that a verbose log file really could help !
--
Good luck
Ivar
[/QUOTE]
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
Apr 1, 2014, 4:29 a.m. EDT
hello
i have the same problem with acoustic-piezoelectric interaction with laminar flow and then using particle tracing as the results. but I can't couple acoustic with laminar flow and particle tracing. i can't see pressure and velocity field in the acoustophoresis force in particle tracing. I want to use pressure and velocity field that is made in acoustic-piezoelectric interaction physic in particle tracing but i can't couple them.
thanks
hello
i have the same problem with acoustic-piezoelectric interaction with laminar flow and then using particle tracing as the results. but I can't couple acoustic with laminar flow and particle tracing. i can't see pressure and velocity field in the acoustophoresis force in particle tracing. I want to use pressure and velocity field that is made in acoustic-piezoelectric interaction physic in particle tracing but i can't couple them.
thanks
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 years ago
Jun 1, 2015, 10:13 a.m. EDT
Hi,
I have a problem to use a saved solution.
The model has two physics : Heat Transer and Solid Mechanics.
I disable the solver 1 and create an other solver. I select the solution of solver 1 as initial values for solver 2 by the dependent variables node : Method = solution
Solution = Solver 1
Time = automatic
It is working well for the temperature. But the stresses of Solver 2 at t=0 are 0!
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Alexis
Hi
i have the similar problem now. Did you figure out the solution for your problem?. It would be of great help to me please.....
[QUOTE]
Hi,
I have a problem to use a saved solution.
The model has two physics : Heat Transer and Solid Mechanics.
I disable the solver 1 and create an other solver. I select the solution of solver 1 as initial values for solver 2 by the dependent variables node : Method = solution
Solution = Solver 1
Time = automatic
It is working well for the temperature. But the stresses of Solver 2 at t=0 are 0!
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Alexis
[/QUOTE]
Hi
i have the similar problem now. Did you figure out the solution for your problem?. It would be of great help to me please.....
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
Jun 28, 2015, 9:57 a.m. EDT
I am having the same problem. I am using Pressure acoustics, transient and solid mechanics in a coupled model to see how the wave moves a water particle. Even though they are coupled, the solid mechanics model just shows 0 stress. The acoustics study runs fine and shows the expected result, but when I run a second study for the solid mechanics nothing happens.
I am having the same problem. I am using Pressure acoustics, transient and solid mechanics in a coupled model to see how the wave moves a water particle. Even though they are coupled, the solid mechanics model just shows 0 stress. The acoustics study runs fine and shows the expected result, but when I run a second study for the solid mechanics nothing happens.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
Nov 25, 2015, 1:03 p.m. EST
I too am having problems with the following model. I have an electromagnetic heat source for which I run an EM waves physics, then a heat transfer in solids for looking at the heating effect in a plasmonic structure over 8ns. Now all of this works well however I need to measure the heat diffusion after the laser pulse, that is the EM source is turned off. Hence I created another heat transfer physics (ht2) component and set up study 2 to solve only for the ht2 only. My current problem is that I cannot transfer the temperature (T1) from ht1 to the temperature (T2) of ht2. While the values of T1 from study 1 do transfer into study 2 , I need to figure out how I can set them as the initial values for ht2's T2.
I too am having problems with the following model. I have an electromagnetic heat source for which I run an EM waves physics, then a heat transfer in solids for looking at the heating effect in a plasmonic structure over 8ns. Now all of this works well however I need to measure the heat diffusion after the laser pulse, that is the EM source is turned off. Hence I created another heat transfer physics (ht2) component and set up study 2 to solve only for the ht2 only. My current problem is that I cannot transfer the temperature (T1) from ht1 to the temperature (T2) of ht2. While the values of T1 from study 1 do transfer into study 2 , I need to figure out how I can set them as the initial values for ht2's T2.
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
9 years ago
Dec 25, 2015, 4:58 a.m. EST
Dear Osameh,
The way to do this is to solve your initial model, then go back to Study 1. Open it, right-click "Solver 1" and press "Disable". This means that the solver sequence, and the solution attached to it, will not be changed. If you now right-click Study 1, and press "Show default solver", then a new solver sequence is built (Solver 2). Open this one, and in "Dependent variables", choose the solution from Solver 1 as initial values.
Tip #1: To keep an overview, it helps to rename "Solver 1" to "Solver V=3" or something related to your boundary condition, so that you can keep track of which solver contains what. The same goes for the solution.
Tip #2: You can automatize this process by using a parametric sweep.
Hope that helps,
Ruud Borger
COMSOLBV
Are these steps supposed to accelerate convergence? Because I followed them but I get a solution in the exact same time of the previous one.
--
Abdulrahman Al Rumaidh
Mechanical Engineering Student | University of Bahrain
[QUOTE]
Dear Osameh,
The way to do this is to solve your initial model, then go back to Study 1. Open it, right-click "Solver 1" and press "Disable". This means that the solver sequence, and the solution attached to it, will not be changed. If you now right-click Study 1, and press "Show default solver", then a new solver sequence is built (Solver 2). Open this one, and in "Dependent variables", choose the solution from Solver 1 as initial values.
Tip #1: To keep an overview, it helps to rename "Solver 1" to "Solver V=3" or something related to your boundary condition, so that you can keep track of which solver contains what. The same goes for the solution.
Tip #2: You can automatize this process by using a parametric sweep.
Hope that helps,
Ruud Borger
COMSOLBV
[/QUOTE]
Are these steps supposed to accelerate convergence? Because I followed them but I get a solution in the exact same time of the previous one.
--
Abdulrahman Al Rumaidh
Mechanical Engineering Student | University of Bahrain