Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Reverse Joule Heating
Posted Nov 15, 2012, 8:48 AM EST AC/DC & Electromagnetics, Heat Transfer & Phase Change, Modeling Tools, Parameters, Variables, & Functions 8 Replies
This is my first time using Comsol so please bare with me :)
I'm doing a model of a HV power cable, that heats up due to the current flowing through it.
I know that the temperature of the isolation material can not exceed 90degC so i want to figure out how much current this allows.
It's a 2D model where i have a circular crosssection of the cable.
I set the temperature at the boundry of the conductor to 90degC. I put a 1.3m thick layer of soil around the cable (also circular) which is 15degC at the outer boundry.
Then I set a point potential in the middle of the conductor to 150kV and put ground at the outer boundry of the isolation layer.
When i run this i get some very low current densities. Maybe my problem is that the current i flowing i random directions and not into or out of the 2D plane as was intended.
And i'm not sure that it even depends on the temperature i specified or just calculates from the voltage and the resistance of the material.
PS. i attatched my comcol file
what you did is to give a disc of copper a potential of 15 kV and sourround it with some grounded, insulating material. Electrically-physically thinking, not simulation-minded thinking, what would happen?
There is no way the current could pass. Resulting in no influence to the thermodynamics.
You have a cable, that is something like an ideal geometry for an axisymmetric model. Try it this way. 2D axisymmetric model with a reasonable voltage drop along the middle of the cable, so that the current has a way to follow.
Thank you for the answer!
I did actually think of this, but by spicifying a voltage drop wouldn't i just inderectly specify i current since V=I*R or as would do it in comsol V=I/length/conductivity?
yes and no. COMSOL solves for a V- and T-field and the resulting current must fit to both of them.
I would think the first guess of the current is from voltage drop and material, which results in a rise of temperature. Which in turn is constrained by your temperature boundary condition. The change of temperature yields a different resistance and therefore a different current.
But you are right, maybe electric potential and ground aren't the most suitable BCs for your model. This is up to you, you have to evaluate that.
As a matter of fact, you need a source and a sink for your current, just to determine the direction of the current. So one possibility that comes to my mind is to use ground as sink and a boundary current source as source. The amount of current flowing out of that source might be given by some coupling operator that integrates the current flowing through a cross section of your wire.
This doesn't determine the current by voltage and resistance in advance...
Keep us up to date on this! I'm interested in how you solve that problem.
I made a 2D axissymmetric model of 1 meter of the cable.
Then I set a 150 kV potential in one end of the cable and calculated the potential in the other end of the cable. I did this using a current from a matlab simulation of the same problem.
Then i set a heat source to the total power dissapation.
This is a bit different from what i originally wanted to do. But couldn't figure out how to do it.
But there are still some mysteries to me.
First of all the current I is 2363 Amps. But when i use this to calculate the voltage drop, the temp. increase is very small and when i plot the current (J*area) i get something way smaller than what i originally put in.
So what i did was that i multiplied the current with the cross section of the concucor and used this to calculate the voltage drop. And somehow it works! Also when i plot the current now i get exactly the current i put in..
Why is this?
(See the attached model)
first a trick: in V4 for a rectangle, or any geometrical shape, with "shell items, you should use the "layer" functionality of the geometry node, its far easier and quicker to set up a series of rectangles as you have
You should check your units, COMSOL flags them orange, these could be wrong in the set-up of the lower voltage which could explain some differences.
Then in 2D-axi you should distinguish current density calculations on the exit boundary and the loop length term 2*pi*r that must be added to transform a edge calculation in 2D-axi into a true surface calculation in the 3D equivalent representation. There is a tab under integration advanced to turn it on automatically, or you should add the 2*pi*r manually to your equations (but not both ;)
You have not fully got the subtleties of 2D axi, try it out on a simple case, and calculate volumes and surfaces and check manually until you have the concept in full control.
Finally, as you have a good GND shielding, your E field in DC will never pass, so you do not really need to calculate the Electric currents in the concrete. This might however change slightly in a AC case, but then you need also to define the GND or equivalent impedance on the external concrete side
I found out what i was doing wrong in the 2D axissymmetric model i posted earlier. I used the resistivity (ohm*m) where i should have used the resistance (ohm/m). But then i devided the current by the area which canceled out my mistake and that is why i got the correct results inspite of the wrong approach. (Let me know if anyone wants to see the final model)
The next step for me is to transfer this to my next problem.
What i want to do now is to make a model of the same cabel that has a bend and see what effect that bend has on the temperature compared to the straight one i already did.
I figure that after doing the geometry i'll use the same approach as in the 2D axissymm. model.
Do you have any alternative ideas to solving this new problem?
Bt pls check carefully the 2D-axi symmetric loop length 2*pi*r in your integrations, I'm not sure you have them all right
integration of a surface = domain in 2D-axi is no volume you must integrate 2*pi*r*integrand_over_suface to get a true 3D volumetric value, the same for an boundary=edge in 2D-axi, it becomes a surface via the integration of 2*pi*r*integrand_over an edge in 3D
I am working on something similar concerning submarine power cables. It would be really appreciated if you can share your final model with me (if possible). Also, I would like to know how did you calculate the current passing using Matlab.
Thank you for your help.
Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.