Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Exterior field sum
Posted Apr 15, 2026, 5:52 a.m. EDT Structural & Acoustics, Acoustics & Vibrations, Modeling Workflow Version 6.4 7 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Hi,
I'm trying to optimize the far-field pattern of multiple acoustic sources (an array of sorts) by tweaking their phases. Rather than simulating the whole thing over and over, I think it could be smart to calculate the radiation of each source individually at first, and then simply calculating the exterior field based on the sum of these with various phases applied. Is this possible?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
If you are doing a frequency sweep, then there is an assumption of linearity. When linearity holds, you can sum up individual parts of several sources, and you can change the phase (and magnitude) of each of them as you please, so just apply a unit input and adjust in post-processing. But, if the sources have an associated impedance, then that needs to be included for each study. So, if you apply a displacement/velocity/acceleration condition on one active source, then all other sources (passive) can be hard walls, which is anyway the default. For other source types, there is more to it. This is equivalent to Thevenin/Norton approaches to electrical sources.
-------------------René Christensen, PhD
Acculution ApS
www.acculution.com
info@acculution.com
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Thanks! Indeed, the other sources are hard walls and I have no issues summing the pressure fields from individual sources, but summing the exterior fields (efc1.pext by default, to be clear) does not work properly. I can do BEM or extend the computational domain in FEM but both options are pretty much slower than a smaller FEM domain with EFC
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Thanks! Indeed, the other sources are hard walls and I have no issues summing the pressure fields from individual sources, but summing the exterior fields (efc1.pext by default, to be clear) does not work properly. I can do BEM or extend the computational domain in FEM but both options are pretty much slower than a smaller FEM domain with EFC
What is the problem with the exterior field? It has phase information in it.
-------------------René Christensen, PhD
Acculution ApS
www.acculution.com
info@acculution.com
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
That's a good question. Summing the exterior fields just seems to produce very incorrect results, although it doesn't look totally random either. What's curious is that the dynamic range of the radiation pattern seems to increase from around 60dB to 130dB, if that helps at all guessing what I might be doing wrong
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
That's a good question. Summing the exterior fields just seems to produce very incorrect results, although it doesn't look totally random either. What's curious is that the dynamic range of the radiation pattern seems to increase from around 60dB to 130dB, if that helps at all guessing what I might be doing wrong
Probably best you just upload the file.
-------------------René Christensen, PhD
Acculution ApS
www.acculution.com
info@acculution.com
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Nevermind! After I managed to convince LLMs that superposition should apply, they pointed out the obvious flaw: I was using Lp_pext instead of summing pext and converting to SPL :)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Good :)
-------------------René Christensen, PhD
Acculution ApS
www.acculution.com
info@acculution.com
Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.
Suggested Content
- FORUM Near Field Magnetic Field
- BLOG How to Place Inlet and Outlet Boundary Conditions in CFD Simulations
- FORUM Electrode field
- FORUM Field Enhancement
- KNOWLEDGE BASE Two-Phase Flow Modeling Guidelines
