Note: This discussion is about an older version of the COMSOL Multiphysics® software. The information provided may be out of date.
Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.
Problem using extrusion coupling variable.
Posted Mar 15, 2011, 9:24 a.m. EDT Mesh, Modeling Tools & Definitions, Parameters, Variables, & Functions, Results & Visualization, Studies & Solvers Version 3.5a, Version 4.0, Version 4.0a, Version 4.1 3 Replies
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
My model consists of two geometry. Geo1 is 1D while geo2 is 2D. The type of mesh for geo2 is square mapped mesh.(Since geo2 is square.)
The physics of geo1 is diffusion in z direction(1D diffusion in the packed bed reactor) while the physics of geometry 2 is diffusion in r direction(1D diffusion in the spherical particle+reaction). The gas molecules travel along the packed bed reactor and diffuse into the catalyst particle.
I try to couple Geo1 and Geo2 using extrusion coupling variable. The extrusion variable for geo1 is subdomain extrusion variable while the extrusion variable for geo2 is boundary extrusion variable(It's the first derivative term.) at one side of geo2. In this case, I think I can use linear transformation.
The obtained results were compared with analytical solution.(To test the accuracy of the model) The results from COMSOL were close to analytical solution.(About 10% error) So I increased the numbers of meshes and decreased the tolerance values in solver setting(I hoped the results would be better.) but the results remained the same as before(Not significantly change).
Do you have any suggestions on this?
The physics of geo1 is diffusion in z direction(1D diffusion in the packed bed reactor) while the physics of geometry 2 is diffusion in r direction(1D diffusion in the spherical particle+reaction). The gas molecules travel along the packed bed reactor and diffuse into the catalyst particle.
I try to couple Geo1 and Geo2 using extrusion coupling variable. The extrusion variable for geo1 is subdomain extrusion variable while the extrusion variable for geo2 is boundary extrusion variable(It's the first derivative term.) at one side of geo2. In this case, I think I can use linear transformation.
The obtained results were compared with analytical solution.(To test the accuracy of the model) The results from COMSOL were close to analytical solution.(About 10% error) So I increased the numbers of meshes and decreased the tolerance values in solver setting(I hoped the results would be better.) but the results remained the same as before(Not significantly change).
Do you have any suggestions on this?
3 Replies Last Post Mar 16, 2011, 5:26 p.m. EDT