Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 years ago
May 26, 2015, 4:53 p.m. EDT
anyone can give some suggestions?
anyone can give some suggestions?
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 years ago
May 27, 2015, 9:48 a.m. EDT
Okay, since nobody else responds, and I'm struggling with a similar issue, I'll do the best I can.
I think the issue is you want to ease the solution toward contact. That means doing a "continuation" approach, ramping a parameter which brings the surfaces into contact, rather than solving for the contact condition directly. The problem is the contact force is SO nonlinear that the system easily gets trapped and doesn't know how to escape. I also check the "nonlinear" option in the solution settings.
BTW, it's not so easy how to figure out how to do a continuation. It's not under parametric study, it's under stationary, under "Study Extensions". But you still provide a parameter ramp just the same. I like normalizing my ramps, for example if I'm applying a 3-d boundary force, I do "range(0, 0.05, 1) * 1e5[N/m^2]", rather than include the units directly in the range parameters. That makes it easier to scale the ramp, or even apply a nonlinear transform if I want the ramp step to be less at the beginning or end of the ramp.
Support can kick in and provide a better answer. I'm learning, as you are. So worth what you paid for ....
Okay, since nobody else responds, and I'm struggling with a similar issue, I'll do the best I can.
I think the issue is you want to ease the solution toward contact. That means doing a "continuation" approach, ramping a parameter which brings the surfaces into contact, rather than solving for the contact condition directly. The problem is the contact force is SO nonlinear that the system easily gets trapped and doesn't know how to escape. I also check the "nonlinear" option in the solution settings.
BTW, it's not so easy how to figure out how to do a continuation. It's not under parametric study, it's under stationary, under "Study Extensions". But you still provide a parameter ramp just the same. I like normalizing my ramps, for example if I'm applying a 3-d boundary force, I do "range(0, 0.05, 1) * 1e5[N/m^2]", rather than include the units directly in the range parameters. That makes it easier to scale the ramp, or even apply a nonlinear transform if I want the ramp step to be less at the beginning or end of the ramp.
Support can kick in and provide a better answer. I'm learning, as you are. So worth what you paid for ....
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 years ago
May 27, 2015, 7:32 p.m. EDT
Daniel,
I appreciate your reply!
Are you saying a parameter sweep to find the contact point? I am actually looking for the contact area under different pressure level. That is to say, I need to know the contacting point as well as at even larger pressure, how much does it contact. And the problem right now is that, it penetrate the surface instead of making contact.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Daniel,
I appreciate your reply!
Are you saying a parameter sweep to find the contact point? I am actually looking for the contact area under different pressure level. That is to say, I need to know the contacting point as well as at even larger pressure, how much does it contact. And the problem right now is that, it penetrate the surface instead of making contact.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 years ago
Jun 4, 2015, 4:14 p.m. EDT
Hello Quingbo,
I have the same problem.
Sadly I don't have an answer.
Did you find an solution and can tell me how do fix the problem?
Maybe somone else can help me/us.
Hello Quingbo,
I have the same problem.
Sadly I don't have an answer.
Did you find an solution and can tell me how do fix the problem?
Maybe somone else can help me/us.
Jeff Hiller
COMSOL Employee
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
10 years ago
Jun 5, 2015, 8:10 a.m. EDT
Hello Qingbo,
The model in your file is not set up as a contact problem.
For an introduction on contact modeling, read the Structural Mechanics Module's User's Guide, version 5.1, page 121 and following.
Best,
Jeff
Hello Qingbo,
The model in your file is not set up as a contact problem.
For an introduction on contact modeling, read the Structural Mechanics Module's User's Guide, version 5.1, page 121 and following.
Best,
Jeff
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
8 years ago
Jul 6, 2016, 8:18 a.m. EDT
Hi friends,
I also having the problem of deformation above the physical limit. In my geometry there are 3 layers. The first one is an epoxy layer, Middle one is a glass fiberand the third layer is again the same epoxy material. While a mechanical load is applying on the outer layers , each domain moves beyond the physical limit. Please see the attached image. How Can I solve this issue.
Please send your valuable suggestions
Hi friends,
I also having the problem of deformation above the physical limit. In my geometry there are 3 layers. The first one is an epoxy layer, Middle one is a glass fiberand the third layer is again the same epoxy material. While a mechanical load is applying on the outer layers , each domain moves beyond the physical limit. Please see the attached image. How Can I solve this issue.
Please send your valuable suggestions